The polarity of survival hinges on the efficacy of a nation’s establishment, governance, strategic foresight, and economic growth. In a society where rudimentary prerequisites essential for human sustenance – akin to better job opportunities, healthcare facilities, basic sanitisation are secured, the empowerment of the people not only fortifies national growth but also plants a seed of empathy, fostering a culture imbued with compassion. An enterprise solely driven by a mission of service to its people cultivates a land that honours the sanctity of life, demonstrates happiness and well-being, and brings prosperity unlike nations propelled by personal vendetta that side-lines the legitimate needs of their citizens.
What happens when basic needs are not met? What if the governing body is redundant, foolhardy, and incapable of steering a nation toward growth? What becomes of its citizens when a country forfeits the fundamental rights of its people and wages war to serve its own agenda? Lives are sacrificed, and innocents are killed when logic is exercised without compassion. What is the outcome when citizens are forced to survive amidst insecurity and poverty, when their rights are usurped and ultimately vanquished? Lack of basic hygiene factors and deprivation of food and shelter compel families living below the poverty line – the refugees – to seek asylum illegally in faraway lands in the hope of securing a better future for their children. But what happens when illegal migration and trade entail life-threatening risks? When traversing borders in silence doesn’t go as planned, the journey toward survival can end in tragedy.
Vincent Delecroix, in his book ‘SMALL BOAT,’ vehemently explores the inexplicably fragile nature of the human mind and the rationale behind the limitations of logic. When confronted with situations demanding a high emotional quotient and understanding, a mind bereft of conclusive reasoning is deeply contrived to rescind any emotion that evokes remorse or self-loathing – particularly to the extent of conceding a decision gone wrong, even at the cost of human lives. What behavior ordains a thought so reproachable, triggering a chain of cataclysmic proportions? A fundamental lack of empathy and compassion for fellow humans and society.
Inspired by harrowing real-life events, the author brilliantly encapsulates and deftly transforms a human tragedy into a compelling work of ethical fiction. In pursuit of a promising future, on November 24th, 2021, in the pre-dawn hours, 29 hopeful migrants embarked on a perilous journey across the English Channel. Departing from the French coast, they sought to reach Britain through clandestine means in an overcrowded dinghy designed for no more than 5 to 6 passengers.
Tragically, catastrophe struck when the vessel’s engine malfunctioned mid-crossing. No help arrived, despite repeated calls for assistance throughout the night, and the migrants, adrift and exposed to the biting cold of the Channel’s waters, were left to battle the elements in the pitch-black darkness. Eventually the dinghy capsized, and twenty-seven of the twenty-nine migrants perished, and their bodies were washed ashore on the coast of France. A sombre reminder of the desperate measures to which individuals are driven in their quest for hope and survival.
Delecroix voices the redundancy of peculiar, restrained relations, fractured human solidarity that is conveniently swept under the carpet – silently burdened by the weight of legalism and national borders, boldly exposing failure in the system and the erosion of individual conscience. The fictional narrative builds around the coast guard operator who, on that fateful night, becomes a chilling emblem of bureaucratic detachment. Definitely not a caricature of cruelty but a proponent who intellectualizes her inaction through logic, during a police interrogation captured from the operator’s introspective accounts of the incidents in Chapters 1 and 3, she – the narrator – offers a first-person monologue asserting the necessity of procedural correctness of her action with chilling lucidity to mask an innate void of empathy and compassion toward the illegal migrants, reminding us that indifference is a methodical cultivated demeanor and is not the absence of feeling.
What’s most distressing is her tone: placating yet indifferent, with her voice contemplative and disturbingly rational – a disconcerting dichotomy of psychic dissonance, caught between the peril of professional detachment and the solace of total abstraction, with complete dissolution of ownership in the face of death.
Part 2 of the book shifts from the first-person narrative to third-person account and offers a poignant, vivid portrayal of the migrants aboard the sinking dinghy, exposing the big void between the bureaucratic thought process and the lived experiences of the underprivileged rendered invisible by borders.
Delecroix’s critique of structured segregation juxtaposes pathos with the growing effrontery of the rich and powerful toward the meek and unfortunate, as it exposes a societal failure to establish morality and compassion, where empathy is systematically obliterated by those wielding power in order to leverage gain for self-serving needs. In this framework, operators in charge speak the language of legality and procedure, effectively undermining the rights of commoners/migrants who are left at the mercy of weather forecasts and intermittent radio signals, thus killing the very essence of humanity.
This book compels one to interrogate the legality of human rights and the sanctity of life, that both of which appear increasingly taken for granted or, worse legally permitted. It raises urgent questions: have we, as a species, degraded to our lowest moral point? Have the moral values that shape our humanity been eroded? Is this what we have been reduced to, a civilization fashioned by greed, steeped in moral decay, and numbered by indolence?
View this post on Instagram